🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion say that indecision over how to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.